Argentine Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women and Men Aged 50 Years and Older.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide an evidence-based framework to guide health care professionals treating patients under glucocorticoid (GC) therapy and develop guidelines for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) in postmenopausal women and men aged ≥50 years. METHODS: An expert panel on bone diseases designed a series of clinically meaningful questions following the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome) structure. Using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology, we made a systematic literature review, extracted and summarized the effect estimates, and graded the quality of the evidence. The expert panel voted each PICO question and made recommendations after reaching an agreement of at least 70%. RESULTS: Seventeen recommendations (9 strong and 8 conditional) and 8 general principles were developed for postmenopausal women and men aged ≥50 years under GC treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD), occurrence of fragility fractures, probability of fracture at 10 years by Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, and other screening factors for low BMD are recommended for patient evaluation and stratification according to fragility fracture risk. The treatment of patients under GC therapy should include counseling on lifestyle habits and strict control of comorbidities. The goal of GIO treatment is the nonoccurrence of new fragility fractures as well as to increase or maintain BMD in certain clinical situations. This was considered for the therapeutic approach in different clinical scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: This GIO guideline provides evidence-based guidance for health care providers treating patients.

Is sarcopenia a risk factor for rotator cuff tears?

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is the loss of muscle mass and consequent loss of muscle function with aging. Currently, it is considered an independent risk factor for falls and fractures, disability, postoperative complications, and mortality. Rotator cuff tears are known to be influenced by systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, thyroid disease, and osteoporosis. The aim of our study was to determine if there is a correlation between sarcopenia prevalence and rotator cuff tears. METHODS: This is a prospective case-control study. Between May 2017 and May 2018, 106 patients were evaluated and divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (cases) included 53 consecutive patients with chronic symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears (mean age, 72 ± 5 years), and group 2 (controls) included 53 patients without rotator cuff tears (mean age, 71 ± 6 years). Sarcopenia was diagnosed with the presence of 2 of 3 criteria: low skeletal muscle mass, inadequate muscle strength, and inadequate physical performance. Rotator cuff integrity was evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging in all patients. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in baseline data and demographic factors between the groups, except for the smoking habit (P = .02). The prevalence of sarcopenia was not significantly different between the groups, nor were gait speed, grip strength, and skeletal muscle mass index (P = .15, .99, and .9, respectively). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with rotator cuff tears was similar to an age- and sex-matched control population. Thus, with these results, we are not able to consider sarcopenia as an independent risk factor for rotator cuff tears.

[Argentine guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, 2015]. / Guías argentinas para el diagnóstico, la prevención y el tratamiento de la osteoporosis 2015.

Osteoporosis is an evolving disease which affects over 200 million people worldwide. Our recommendations are guidelines for its diagnosis, prevention and treatment, but they do not constitute standards for clinical decisions in individual cases. The physician must adapt them to individual special situations, incorporating personal factors that transcend the limits of these guidelines and are dependent on the knowledge and art of the practice of Medicine. These guidelines should be reviewed and updated periodically as new, better and more effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools become available.

Guías Argentinas para el diagnóstico, la prevención y el tratamiento de la osteoporosis 2015 / Argentine guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, 2015

La osteoporosis es una enfermedad en constante crecimiento y que afecta a más de 200 millones de personas en todo el mundo. Nuestras recomendaciones son guías para el diagnóstico, la prevención y tratamiento, pero no normas para las decisiones clínicas en casos individuales. El médico debe adaptarlas a situaciones en la práctica clínica cotidiana, incorporando factores personales que trascienden los límites de estas guías y hacen al saber y al arte de la práctica médica. Como todo conocimiento científico, deben ser actualizadas periódicamente a medida que se adquieran nuevas, mejores y más efectivas herramientas diagnósticas y terapéuticas.

Osteoporosis is an evolving disease which affects over 200 million people worldwide. Our recommendations are guidelines for its diagnosis, prevention and treatment, but they do not constitute standards for clinical decisions in individual cases. The physician must adapt them to individual special situations, incorporating personal factors that transcend the limits of these guidelines and are dependent on the knowledge and art of the practice of Medicine. These guidelines should be reviewed and updated periodically as new, better and more effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools become available.

Strontium ranelate effect on bone mineral density is modified by previous bisphosphonate treatment.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of strontium ranelate (SrR) on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers after 1 year of treatment. Additionally, the effect of SrR in bisphosphonate-naïve patients (BP-naïve) compared to patients previously treated with bisphosphonates (BP-prior) was analyzed. This retrospective study included 482 postmenopausal women treated with SrR (2 g/day) for 1 year in ten Argentine centers; 41 patients were excluded due to insufficient data, while 441 were included. Participants were divided according to previous bisphosphonate treatment in two groups: BP-naïve (n = 87) and BP-prior (n = 350). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. After 1 year of treatment with SrR the bone formation markers total alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin were increased (p < 0.0001), while the bone resorption marker s-CTX was decreased (p = 0.0579). Also increases in BMD at the lumbar spine (LS, 3.73%), femoral neck (FN, 2.00%) and total hip (TH, 1.54%) [p < 0.0001] were observed. These increments were significant (p < 0.0001) both among BP-naïve and BP-prior patients. Interestingly, the change in BMD after 1 year of SrR treatment was higher in BP-naïve patients: LS: BP-naïve = 4.58 ± 0.62%; BP-prior = 3.45 ± 0.28% (p = 0.078). FN: BP-naïve = 2.79 ± 0.56%; BP-prior = 2.13 ± 0.29% (p = 0.161). TH: BP-naïve = 3.01 ± 0.55%; BP-prior = 1.22 ± 0.27% (p = 0.0006). SrR treatment increased BMD and bone formation markers and decreased a bone resorption marker in the whole group, with better response in BP-naïve patients.

Effects of deflazacort vs. methylprednisone: a randomized study in kidney transplant patients.

Metabolic effects of deflazacort vs. methylprednisone were studied in prepubertal patients after kidney transplantation. Thirty-one patients participated: 15 received deflazacort and 16 remained on methylprednisone. The study started at a mean of 2.1 years after transplantation, when patients were randomized to either continue with methylprednisone or switch to deflazacort. Height velocity increased more in the deflazacort than in the methylprednisone group only during the first 2 years: 5.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.5 +/- 0.3 cm/year, and 4.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.4 cm/year p=0.007, [by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)]. After 2 and 3 years, the number of patients who were overweight increased in the methylprednisone group and decreased in the deflazacort group; p<0.01. Lean body mass increased more in the deflazacort than in the methylprednisone group (p=0.003). Fat body mass increased only in the methylprednisone group (p<0.01). Total cholesterol and low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol increased in the methylprednisone group (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). Total and LDL cholesterol were reduced (p<0.01 and p<0.001, respectively), whereas high-density-lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol increased (p<0.001) during deflazacort therapy. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) decreased in both groups, but total skeleton BMD decreased only in the methylprednisone group (p<0.001). Finally, normal glucose/insulin ratio, defined as > 7, was associated (p<0.05) with the deflazacort group. Our data suggest that deflazacort therapy might improve linear growth and lean body mass and prevent excessive bone loss and fat accumulation. It also leads to an improvement in lipoprotein profile without reduction in insulin sensitivity.

Agreement analysis of variables involved in lipodystrophy syndrome definition in HIV-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Lipodystrophy studies in HIV-infected patients have usually defined abnormalities in body fat by clinical evaluation and patient questionnaires. Despite the risk for bias with these subjective approaches, agreement analysis among the large number of variables employed was seldom performed. OBJECTIVE: To analyze consistency between the usual approaches for definition of abnormalities in body fat distribution. DESIGN: We evaluated agreement between the clinical and questionnaire findings for abnormalities in body fat in an HIV patient population under antiretroviral treatment followed in our institution, using different criteria for definitions of body fat abnormalities within the same data set. METHODS: Kappa analysis for consistency and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed. RESULTS: Low levels of agreement between clinical and patient perspectives were observed. Only one combination of criteria showed adequate agreement results. The waist/hip ratio showed low levels of agreement with all other variables, and no clear discriminative point was observed by ROC curve analysis. The ratio between the trunk fat content and the leg fat content assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan demonstrated better agreement and more clear discriminative values for both male and female patients. CONCLUSION: Agreement analyses may help in the selection of the subjective variable methodology and in the inclusion of consistent and nonredundant objective measurements for diagnosis of abnormalities in body fat.